The petitioner was answerable for his personal predicament. In case the petitioner was dissatisfied While using the judgment within the match, he must have used the legal right of charm as an alternative to forfeiting that selection and resorting into a belated application beneath Segment 151, C. And in the https://spencerurjty.blogsvila.com/32304928/a-review-of-corporate-lawyer-in-sindh